Skip to main content

Micron: New Nvidia?

Nvidia has been hottest tech company (and stock) for last 3 years with his stock more than triple in just 18 months. Most of the excitement is justified due to Nvidia's unique position in cloud players (Amazon, Google etc) as well as emergence of Artificial Intelligence in self-driving cars (Tesla and so on). So while Nvidia stock may not repeat last 3 years feat, there are other companies which could offer similar excitement. Micron (MU) has been on similar trend with its stock already tripling from under 12 to 39 in 18 months. Last week Micron announced record quarter with revenues growing at 91% compared to last year. Let's look at factors which are causing "commodity" players like Micron shine.
  • Micron makes DRAM and NAND memories. In technology world, ASP (average selling prices) go down every year. Due to demand and supply imbalance, ASP for DRAM and NAND   have gone UP by 6-8%. That's rare!
  • On demand side:
    • Memory markets used to be driven mainly by PC industry. It's no more true since memory is being used across so many devices like mobiles, automobiles, robots, VR, watches, IOT devices and so on
    • Average use of memory everywhere is going up (blame it on SW engineers)
    • Applications are becoming memory intensive even if some of the compute intensive tasks can be handled by customized ASICs/GPU/TPUs
  • On supply side:
    • There are really only 3-4 players in this market - Samsung, Hynix, Micron and Toshiba
    • It takes major capital investments and close to 3 years to bring on new supply
    • Due to obvious benefits of quadropoly, none of the suppliers want to rock the boat by over-supplying the market
So in all, supply-demand would remain in favor of demand and hence ASP of memory would remain high or steady for some more time. 
With Sanjay Mehrotra as CEO, Micron got a seasoned CEO (and he is from Cal, Go Bears!) with excellent background in technology and business. So Micron company is in very good position. What does it mean to stock given it has already gone up so much. It is worth the investment? After results, it has already gone up by over 11% in one week. It has potential to go $60 in next 18 months giving potential return of over 50%. (MU management rejected Chinese offer 3 years back to acquire it at $33 which was right decision). I recommended it at $22 at start of year and would still stand behind my recommendation of MU at $38-$39. Given that Oct is here (worst month for stock markets), you may want to wait to see how it plays out over next 3-4 weeks and take small positions if stock goes down.

PS: Usual caveat of doing your own research before investing remains!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2026: The Year of Convergence – Melt-up, Moonshots, or Mid-cycle Correction?

Happy New Year! After another period of self-imposed hibernation from the blog—partly due to the festivals, travel, intertia and partly to watch the dust settle on a chaotic 2025—I decided to use the quiet of this New Year’s morning to finally reboot.  Looking back at my October post,  “Clicks to Tokens,”  the hunch about the AI theme held firm. We spent much of 2025 debating whether we were in 1998 or 2000. As we enter 2026, the answer seems to be "neither and both." We have the roaring optimism of the 1920s fueled by "Silicon Spirits," but with the high-speed volatility of the 2020s. So, as the calendar flips, what is in store for 2026? Markets may experience melt-up (S&P touching 8000),  with some moonshots (like SpaceX and OpenAI) IPOs or even see mid-cycle correction bringing down S&P to 6000. That's a wide range and will be decided by Four R's... Here are my thoughts on the " Four R’s ":  Rates, Robots, Rotations, and Real Assets. 1. ...

Rockets, Relics & Roaring Markets: The $4 Trillion Crossroads of 1927 and 1999

Happy (almost) Summer! After watching Kevin Warsh get sworn in at a White House ceremony two days ago, tracking three S-1 filings that could collectively hoover up more capital than every U.S. IPO since 2022 combined, and watching 26-year-old stock charts finally break to new highs — it felt like the right moment to ask the uncomfortable question out loud. Are we at a party that ends gracefully, or one that ends with the furniture on fire? The market is simultaneously flashing the neon signs of 1999  and  the orchestral excess of 1927. Most commentators reach for the dot-com playbook. I think the original Roaring Twenties is the better map. Here's why... Assembly Lines to AI Clusters Ford's River Rouge complex was the largest industrial facility on earth in the 1920s — raw iron in one end, a Model T out the other. Steel, rubber, and oil became the picks-and-shovels of the age. GE and Westinghouse were electrifying factories and homes. The infrastructure buildout  was ...

Stree-Dhan vs. Oracle of Omaha!

Happy February! After another brief hibernation from the blog—partly to digest the early year volatility and partly to observe the shifting sands of global liquidity—it’s time to look at some fascinating disconnects in the market. Lately, I’ve been thinking about the "Unbeatable Asset Class." No, I’m not talking about the S&P 500 or Nvidia. I’m talking about a collective force that has quietly outperformed the "Oracle of Omaha" for over two decades. 1. The Golden Saree: Indian Women vs. Warren Buffett If you look at the performance of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) since the launch of the GLD ETF (the first gold ETF) in late 2004, you’ll find a startling reality. While Buffett is the gold standard of value investing, the "Gold Standard" itself—specifically in the hands of Indian households—has been a formidable rival. Data shows that since the inception of the GLD ETF in November 2004, the total return on Gold has actually surpassed Berkshire Hathaway. I...