Skip to main content

"Irrational Exuberance" - Time to be careful !

Nasdaq is at 10 year high. Almost all "pundits" on markets are way too optimistic. It's almost feel like 1995-1996 when Fed Chairman at that time Alan Greenspan famously quoted about "Irrational Exuberance" in markets. It was another matter than markets keep on drinking the "new Internet age" cool-aid for another 3 and 1/2 years before bubble burst. Greenspan was 3 years earlier in his prediction. One of the reason was his own policies at fed which caused this bubble. IMO we are seeing similar signs of "Irrational Exuberance" in markets at least for last few weeks. However it is not clear if this would go on for another month, year or week. To be frank, at this time, I cannot predict short-term move by markets. Markets can be insane longer than one think (both on upside and downside) !
Here are the reasons I feel markets are due for correction:

  • Geo-political risks in Middle-east which could cause oil to jump
  • European debt problem - two (Ireland and Greece) have been handled for short-term. Now it's Portugal's turn
  • Inflation rising not only in emerging countries but also in developed countries like UK. Even in US, it is inching towards 2%
  • China's rate increases to slow down its economy
  • Upcoming end of QEII (it could come earlier than currently anticipated by markets) and eventual Fed rate increases (most likely in Q3 of this year)
  • Stubbornly high unemployment rate in US (would be between 8-9% in 2011)
  • Year-over-year comparisons for earnings becoming difficult in starting in Apr earnings season
Normally "smart money" start anticipating all these events 3-6 months in advance and start positioning their bets accordingly. So what should average investor like us do ?

Here are some tips:
  • Follow Warren Buffet's two rules:
    1. Never lose money 
    2. Never forget first rule
  • Protect your gains
    1. Sell them and sit on cash or
    2. Sell "in-money" covered calls
    3. Buy downside risk protection by buying "puts"
  • Stop paying attention to markets so it won't bother if they down from here: If you can tolerate upcoming "volatility", then sit tight because markets would eventually end higher for 2011 (S&P around 1400)

So if markets are in "irrational exuberance", are there any stocks worth buying ? There are always "value" stocks in any market. Here are few to watch out - mostly based on demographic shifts in US

  • FVE ($6.7)
  • SRZ ($8)
  • AMED ($34)
  • SEM ($7)
Have a great President's Day Weekend !

/Shyam


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2026: The Year of Convergence – Melt-up, Moonshots, or Mid-cycle Correction?

Happy New Year! After another period of self-imposed hibernation from the blog—partly due to the festivals, travel, intertia and partly to watch the dust settle on a chaotic 2025—I decided to use the quiet of this New Year’s morning to finally reboot.  Looking back at my October post,  “Clicks to Tokens,”  the hunch about the AI theme held firm. We spent much of 2025 debating whether we were in 1998 or 2000. As we enter 2026, the answer seems to be "neither and both." We have the roaring optimism of the 1920s fueled by "Silicon Spirits," but with the high-speed volatility of the 2020s. So, as the calendar flips, what is in store for 2026? Markets may experience melt-up (S&P touching 8000),  with some moonshots (like SpaceX and OpenAI) IPOs or even see mid-cycle correction bringing down S&P to 6000. That's a wide range and will be decided by Four R's... Here are my thoughts on the " Four R’s ":  Rates, Robots, Rotations, and Real Assets. 1. ...

Rockets, Relics & Roaring Markets: The $4 Trillion Crossroads of 1927 and 1999

Happy (almost) Summer! After watching Kevin Warsh get sworn in at a White House ceremony two days ago, tracking three S-1 filings that could collectively hoover up more capital than every U.S. IPO since 2022 combined, and watching 26-year-old stock charts finally break to new highs — it felt like the right moment to ask the uncomfortable question out loud. Are we at a party that ends gracefully, or one that ends with the furniture on fire? The market is simultaneously flashing the neon signs of 1999  and  the orchestral excess of 1927. Most commentators reach for the dot-com playbook. I think the original Roaring Twenties is the better map. Here's why... Assembly Lines to AI Clusters Ford's River Rouge complex was the largest industrial facility on earth in the 1920s — raw iron in one end, a Model T out the other. Steel, rubber, and oil became the picks-and-shovels of the age. GE and Westinghouse were electrifying factories and homes. The infrastructure buildout  was ...

Stree-Dhan vs. Oracle of Omaha!

Happy February! After another brief hibernation from the blog—partly to digest the early year volatility and partly to observe the shifting sands of global liquidity—it’s time to look at some fascinating disconnects in the market. Lately, I’ve been thinking about the "Unbeatable Asset Class." No, I’m not talking about the S&P 500 or Nvidia. I’m talking about a collective force that has quietly outperformed the "Oracle of Omaha" for over two decades. 1. The Golden Saree: Indian Women vs. Warren Buffett If you look at the performance of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) since the launch of the GLD ETF (the first gold ETF) in late 2004, you’ll find a startling reality. While Buffett is the gold standard of value investing, the "Gold Standard" itself—specifically in the hands of Indian households—has been a formidable rival. Data shows that since the inception of the GLD ETF in November 2004, the total return on Gold has actually surpassed Berkshire Hathaway. I...