Skip to main content

Social Contract and Income In-equality!

One would think that leader of capitalism USA and only large communist nation (which matters) China would have very different problems. However if you pay closer attention to what's happening in Washington and Beijing and reasons behind it, you would wonder if both systems have created similar societies and trying to address the problem with only slight variations in their approach,

Last 3 decades saw explosive growth in economies and corresponding wealth creation. After financial crisis of 2008-09 it has increased the wealth gap significantly. By some accounts, top 1% of population has 15 times more wealth than bottom 50%. Unicorns (startups valued at more than billion $) are being created every day. Even in China wealth at top has been very concentrated. President Xi is determined to address this with force of regulations as well as policies. In US, progressives are putting pressure on President Biden to enact $3.5 trillion "social contract" bill (and they are willing to take infrastructure bill as hostage). In Bay Area, new engineer with CS/Engineering degree may be earning more than a tenured professor or in some cases medical doctors. One can argue that it's simple supply and demand...but capitalist system is supposed to address this to bring equilibrium...

Coming to market analysis - Sept month was true to its reputation being the worst month for markets. This year was no exception with S&P down by 4.5%. It also sets up markets nicely for last quarter of year. It's like deja-vu of 2011 when similar debt limit discussions and direction FED would take on bond-buying and interest rates brought down markets in late summer/early fall....If 2011 pattern holds, markets should reach all time highs by end of year or early part of 2022.

Chinese regulations continue to impact valuations of Chinese companies and in some cases like BABA or other Chinese web companies, the "China Discount" has reached 50%. That reminds me of Energy Sector during depth of Pandemic in 2020. They were being sold at 50-75% discount to underlying assets. One year later, stocks of many energy companies (which survived) are up by 50-200%, Would that happen to stocks of Chinese companies? China is very big market and despite strict regulations, most of these big Chinese Web companies would survive and eventually prosper and China discount would go down to maybe 20-25%. So if you are daring enough, look at the recommendations in my previous blog. KWEB ($47) is one way to get exposure to Chinese Web companies without single company risk (usual disclaimer applies: Do your own due diligence before investing)

Sports season is heating up with IPL,  College Football and NFL in full swing. I am looking forward to ICC Cricket T20 World Cup. So get ready for sports matchups, movies and holidays!

/Shyam

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Clicks to Tokens: Will 2026 Echo 1998's Boom or 2000's Bust?

My "blogging" was in hibernation last 8 months due to my self-imposed restraint given the environment as well as built-in inertia to get started despite so many interesting events and markets reaching all time highs after taking a big dump around "Liberation Day" in Apr...Around that time I had the blog ready that it would be repeat of Mar/Apr 2020 panic and recovery during onset of Covid Pandemic. The hunch happened to be correct and I was glad that I could keep and take some positions which I am still holding especially around AI theme. But that was then...as 2025 is about to wrap up in 10+ weeks, let's look at what's in store for rest of 2025 and 2026. And what's better time than to start writing again just before one of the most important week on the calendar with multiple key events coming up next week... Fed meeting to decide the course of interest rates - it's almost guaranteed that Fed will cut rates by 25 basis points (2nd time in 2025) and...
Post a Comment
Read more

2026: The Year of Convergence – Melt-up, Moonshots, or Mid-cycle Correction?

Happy New Year! After another period of self-imposed hibernation from the blog—partly due to the festivals, travel, intertia and partly to watch the dust settle on a chaotic 2025—I decided to use the quiet of this New Year’s morning to finally reboot.  Looking back at my October post,  “Clicks to Tokens,”  the hunch about the AI theme held firm. We spent much of 2025 debating whether we were in 1998 or 2000. As we enter 2026, the answer seems to be "neither and both." We have the roaring optimism of the 1920s fueled by "Silicon Spirits," but with the high-speed volatility of the 2020s. So, as the calendar flips, what is in store for 2026? Markets may experience melt-up (S&P touching 8000),  with some moonshots (like SpaceX and OpenAI) IPOs or even see mid-cycle correction bringing down S&P to 6000. That's a wide range and will be decided by Four R's... Here are my thoughts on the " Four R’s ":  Rates, Robots, Rotations, and Real Assets. 1. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stree-Dhan vs. Oracle of Omaha!

Happy February! After another brief hibernation from the blog—partly to digest the early year volatility and partly to observe the shifting sands of global liquidity—it’s time to look at some fascinating disconnects in the market. Lately, I’ve been thinking about the "Unbeatable Asset Class." No, I’m not talking about the S&P 500 or Nvidia. I’m talking about a collective force that has quietly outperformed the "Oracle of Omaha" for over two decades. 1. The Golden Saree: Indian Women vs. Warren Buffett If you look at the performance of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) since the launch of the GLD ETF (the first gold ETF) in late 2004, you’ll find a startling reality. While Buffett is the gold standard of value investing, the "Gold Standard" itself—specifically in the hands of Indian households—has been a formidable rival. Data shows that since the inception of the GLD ETF in November 2004, the total return on Gold has actually surpassed Berkshire Hathaway. I...
Post a Comment
Read more