Skip to main content

Black Swan on horizon?

Black Swan Definition from Investopedia:

A black swan is an unpredictable event that is beyond what is normally expected of a situation and has potentially severe consequences. Black swan events are characterized by their extreme rarity, their severe impact, and the practice of explaining widespread failure to predict them as simple folly in hindsight.

From Markets point of view, there are two events in 2020 which could match the above definition:

Coronavirus becoming Pandemic:
Based on weekend news, the virus has already spread in South Korea, Italy and to some extent Japan. While China is putting extra-ordinary measures to stabilize the situation, other countries are just gearing up to potentially deal with unfolding situation. This means lock down of cities, travel restrictions, cancellations of trade shows and major gatherings to control the potential of spread. Companies have been prudent in cancelling major shows like MWC (Mobile World Congress) and many others. Markets was expecting this to stabilize within few weeks and getting signs that China's measures are working and net new cases have come down significantly. However markets have not taken into account spread beyond China. Economic impact was also supposed to be contained with China. Now most likely world economy in Q1 would be barely positive and potentially slide into negative territory if the spread continues into Q2. Friday yields on 30 year treasury reached all time lows. Bond markets are flashing red signaling trouble ahead. Central banks (US FED being most important) need to gear up for rate cuts and get ahead of the curve before deflation takes hold. Won't be surprised if US Fed declares surprise rate cut in 2020.

Sanders winning Presidency:
Given the primary/caucus voting in first three states, Sanders have momentum and have more than 50% chance of winning democratic nomination unless all other candidates rally behind centrist alternative like Bloomberg. In next 10 days (till Super Tuesday), democratic nomination race would be reduced to 2-3 candidates with clear choice between socialist Sanders vs centrist/capitalist Bloomberg. Young generation (including my kids) are going for Sanders while older voters (like me) would prefer someone like Bloomberg. It would almost feel like: do you want to change the complete system (revolution) vs incrementally improve (evolution). If Sanders wins nomination, it would be a battle between left vs right. Markets have not incorporated the possibility of Sanders presidency (same way it did not consider Trump Presidency in 2016). 

Given the real possibilities of these two events, watch out if you are considering any new investments. 

/Shyam



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Clicks to Tokens: Will 2026 Echo 1998's Boom or 2000's Bust?

My "blogging" was in hibernation last 8 months due to my self-imposed restraint given the environment as well as built-in inertia to get started despite so many interesting events and markets reaching all time highs after taking a big dump around "Liberation Day" in Apr...Around that time I had the blog ready that it would be repeat of Mar/Apr 2020 panic and recovery during onset of Covid Pandemic. The hunch happened to be correct and I was glad that I could keep and take some positions which I am still holding especially around AI theme. But that was then...as 2025 is about to wrap up in 10+ weeks, let's look at what's in store for rest of 2025 and 2026. And what's better time than to start writing again just before one of the most important week on the calendar with multiple key events coming up next week... Fed meeting to decide the course of interest rates - it's almost guaranteed that Fed will cut rates by 25 basis points (2nd time in 2025) and...

2026: The Year of Convergence – Melt-up, Moonshots, or Mid-cycle Correction?

Happy New Year! After another period of self-imposed hibernation from the blog—partly due to the festivals, travel, intertia and partly to watch the dust settle on a chaotic 2025—I decided to use the quiet of this New Year’s morning to finally reboot.  Looking back at my October post,  “Clicks to Tokens,”  the hunch about the AI theme held firm. We spent much of 2025 debating whether we were in 1998 or 2000. As we enter 2026, the answer seems to be "neither and both." We have the roaring optimism of the 1920s fueled by "Silicon Spirits," but with the high-speed volatility of the 2020s. So, as the calendar flips, what is in store for 2026? Markets may experience melt-up (S&P touching 8000),  with some moonshots (like SpaceX and OpenAI) IPOs or even see mid-cycle correction bringing down S&P to 6000. That's a wide range and will be decided by Four R's... Here are my thoughts on the " Four R’s ":  Rates, Robots, Rotations, and Real Assets. 1. ...

Rockets, Relics & Roaring Markets: The $4 Trillion Crossroads of 1927 and 1999

Happy (almost) Summer! After watching Kevin Warsh get sworn in at a White House ceremony two days ago, tracking three S-1 filings that could collectively hoover up more capital than every U.S. IPO since 2022 combined, and watching 26-year-old stock charts finally break to new highs — it felt like the right moment to ask the uncomfortable question out loud. Are we at a party that ends gracefully, or one that ends with the furniture on fire? The market is simultaneously flashing the neon signs of 1999  and  the orchestral excess of 1927. Most commentators reach for the dot-com playbook. I think the original Roaring Twenties is the better map. Here's why... Assembly Lines to AI Clusters Ford's River Rouge complex was the largest industrial facility on earth in the 1920s — raw iron in one end, a Model T out the other. Steel, rubber, and oil became the picks-and-shovels of the age. GE and Westinghouse were electrifying factories and homes. The infrastructure buildout  was ...