Skip to main content

It's time to get some "Energy"!

First half of 2017 is over and earnings season would get full-steam in next 2-3 weeks. Given lack of major pre-announcements, there should not be any major surprises coming out of this season. With Fed taking dovish view on interest rates, markets seem to be loving "Goldilocks" scenario "not too hot not too cold". We already know that some sectors are getting hot like technology especially FANG stocks. At same time, it's worth exploring are there any sectors which are "cold" or "out of favor"? And of course one major sector which keeps on coming on radar is "Energy" sector. It started year on high hopes that OPEC deal in Nov would bring back oil markets in equilibrium and with Trump promises economy would grow closer to 3%. Both of these did not pan out in first half. US shell producers and Nigeria/Libya nullified whatever smaller effect OPEC deal had on supply side and due to lack of any concrete steps from Trump and Congress on tax reforms and infrastructure spending, US economy is still far away from growing at 3%. These two factors caused to oil slip back to $42 (before rising back to $46) and causing energy sector to be worst performing sector in S&P (down by over 12% in just 1H2017) So now question is where is energy sector headed. Here are some factors to look at to make prediction:
  • US congress would one way or other decide on health-care before Aug and move onto other important topics like tax-reforms and infrastructure spending, This should get US economy growing closer to 2% (3% growth seems to be pipe-dream)
  • US Fed would continue to be dovish making US $ weaker compared to Euro/Yen/Pound. This should give some boost to oil prices
  • BRICs would continue to grow at healthy pace with India leading the pack (thanks to Mr. Modi's drive)
  • Europe finally would start to grow with all major elections out of way. Merkel is almost guaranteed to win in Sept for another term
  • With all these factors, overall world economy should be in reasonably good shape
  • Opec would continue to make noises on "quotas" and US shell producers would continue to produce at record levels albeit at much lower costs. This would mean Oil would hover around $42 to $52 range for quite some time
What does all these means to companies in Energy sector. In general, they would be ok due to demand not falling off the cliff and supplies coming at lower cost point. So break even prices for all these companies coming down. Some of the companies/ETF to invest during this pessimism would be QEP ($9), SN ($6), HK ($6), MRO ($11.50), REN ($30), XLE ($65), RSPP ($33), APA ($48), TRGP ($44). The stocks and overall energy sector could have deja-vu like 2016 when they roared back in 4Q2016. Same could happen in 2H2017.
Have a great "Energy" driven weekend!
/Shyam

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2026: The Year of Convergence – Melt-up, Moonshots, or Mid-cycle Correction?

Happy New Year! After another period of self-imposed hibernation from the blog—partly due to the festivals, travel, intertia and partly to watch the dust settle on a chaotic 2025—I decided to use the quiet of this New Year’s morning to finally reboot.  Looking back at my October post,  “Clicks to Tokens,”  the hunch about the AI theme held firm. We spent much of 2025 debating whether we were in 1998 or 2000. As we enter 2026, the answer seems to be "neither and both." We have the roaring optimism of the 1920s fueled by "Silicon Spirits," but with the high-speed volatility of the 2020s. So, as the calendar flips, what is in store for 2026? Markets may experience melt-up (S&P touching 8000),  with some moonshots (like SpaceX and OpenAI) IPOs or even see mid-cycle correction bringing down S&P to 6000. That's a wide range and will be decided by Four R's... Here are my thoughts on the " Four R’s ":  Rates, Robots, Rotations, and Real Assets. 1. ...

Rockets, Relics & Roaring Markets: The $4 Trillion Crossroads of 1927 and 1999

Happy (almost) Summer! After watching Kevin Warsh get sworn in at a White House ceremony two days ago, tracking three S-1 filings that could collectively hoover up more capital than every U.S. IPO since 2022 combined, and watching 26-year-old stock charts finally break to new highs — it felt like the right moment to ask the uncomfortable question out loud. Are we at a party that ends gracefully, or one that ends with the furniture on fire? The market is simultaneously flashing the neon signs of 1999  and  the orchestral excess of 1927. Most commentators reach for the dot-com playbook. I think the original Roaring Twenties is the better map. Here's why... Assembly Lines to AI Clusters Ford's River Rouge complex was the largest industrial facility on earth in the 1920s — raw iron in one end, a Model T out the other. Steel, rubber, and oil became the picks-and-shovels of the age. GE and Westinghouse were electrifying factories and homes. The infrastructure buildout  was ...

Stree-Dhan vs. Oracle of Omaha!

Happy February! After another brief hibernation from the blog—partly to digest the early year volatility and partly to observe the shifting sands of global liquidity—it’s time to look at some fascinating disconnects in the market. Lately, I’ve been thinking about the "Unbeatable Asset Class." No, I’m not talking about the S&P 500 or Nvidia. I’m talking about a collective force that has quietly outperformed the "Oracle of Omaha" for over two decades. 1. The Golden Saree: Indian Women vs. Warren Buffett If you look at the performance of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) since the launch of the GLD ETF (the first gold ETF) in late 2004, you’ll find a startling reality. While Buffett is the gold standard of value investing, the "Gold Standard" itself—specifically in the hands of Indian households—has been a formidable rival. Data shows that since the inception of the GLD ETF in November 2004, the total return on Gold has actually surpassed Berkshire Hathaway. I...