Skip to main content

Trump Inc Startup: Ultimate Unicorn

Two weeks back I predicted that DOW would reach 20K in first quarter of 2017. Looks like it may touch even before end of 2016. I am sure many folks who are investing in stocks are happy with that and must be thanking Trump for that (even though he is not even President yet).
Last week Trump met bigwigs from Technology world for the first time. Given than all except one were against him, it must have been an interesting meeting. Conpiciously other than Palantir and Uber, none of the so called Unicorns were present. Most of the presence was by big companies with market caps over $100 Billion. Talking about Unicorns, "Trump's Presidential bid" must be the ultimate unicorn of all time and majority of folks missed seeing this unicorn which was in front of us for last 18 months. Only few folks from technology - Peter Thiel being one of them (no wonder Peter made big money in Paypal, Palantir and Facebook).

So let's look at "Trump's campaign" as startup and evaluate its success:
  • It was founded by Trump about 2 years back funded by his own money including sweat equity. After all he traveled all over USA and gave countless speeches
  • He took on big establishment on GOP side as well as democratic side
  • He raised money from grass-roots (aka kick-starter style)
  • He smartly targeted spending of ad dollars where it could get maximum ROI similar to startups would do with limited resources
  • He spent half what big company "Clinton Inc" spent
  • Against every one's advice, he spent last few hours in Michigan/Wisconsin/Pennsylvania states where pundits had said it was impossible for Trump to win these states (and these are the states which made him President-elect)
  • He ran the campaign single-handed and ruthlessly (don't we know the style in which Steve Jobs ran Apple during early years?). I think this may be necessary for startups.
  • He effectively ended "Bush" and "Clinton" dynasties similar to what Amazon is doing for so many old-world businesses
  • And it had a blockbuster IPO on Nov 8, 2016. 
Now that Trump Campaign Inc has gone IPO, it is time for Trump to behave like a public company and be accountable to his shareholders (American Citizens).

Comments

Unknown said…
Interesting perspective Shyam, time will tell whether it follows majority of recent tech IPOs..

Popular posts from this blog

2026: The Year of Convergence – Melt-up, Moonshots, or Mid-cycle Correction?

Happy New Year! After another period of self-imposed hibernation from the blog—partly due to the festivals, travel, intertia and partly to watch the dust settle on a chaotic 2025—I decided to use the quiet of this New Year’s morning to finally reboot.  Looking back at my October post,  “Clicks to Tokens,”  the hunch about the AI theme held firm. We spent much of 2025 debating whether we were in 1998 or 2000. As we enter 2026, the answer seems to be "neither and both." We have the roaring optimism of the 1920s fueled by "Silicon Spirits," but with the high-speed volatility of the 2020s. So, as the calendar flips, what is in store for 2026? Markets may experience melt-up (S&P touching 8000),  with some moonshots (like SpaceX and OpenAI) IPOs or even see mid-cycle correction bringing down S&P to 6000. That's a wide range and will be decided by Four R's... Here are my thoughts on the " Four R’s ":  Rates, Robots, Rotations, and Real Assets. 1. ...

Rockets, Relics & Roaring Markets: The $4 Trillion Crossroads of 1927 and 1999

Happy (almost) Summer! After watching Kevin Warsh get sworn in at a White House ceremony two days ago, tracking three S-1 filings that could collectively hoover up more capital than every U.S. IPO since 2022 combined, and watching 26-year-old stock charts finally break to new highs — it felt like the right moment to ask the uncomfortable question out loud. Are we at a party that ends gracefully, or one that ends with the furniture on fire? The market is simultaneously flashing the neon signs of 1999  and  the orchestral excess of 1927. Most commentators reach for the dot-com playbook. I think the original Roaring Twenties is the better map. Here's why... Assembly Lines to AI Clusters Ford's River Rouge complex was the largest industrial facility on earth in the 1920s — raw iron in one end, a Model T out the other. Steel, rubber, and oil became the picks-and-shovels of the age. GE and Westinghouse were electrifying factories and homes. The infrastructure buildout  was ...

Stree-Dhan vs. Oracle of Omaha!

Happy February! After another brief hibernation from the blog—partly to digest the early year volatility and partly to observe the shifting sands of global liquidity—it’s time to look at some fascinating disconnects in the market. Lately, I’ve been thinking about the "Unbeatable Asset Class." No, I’m not talking about the S&P 500 or Nvidia. I’m talking about a collective force that has quietly outperformed the "Oracle of Omaha" for over two decades. 1. The Golden Saree: Indian Women vs. Warren Buffett If you look at the performance of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) since the launch of the GLD ETF (the first gold ETF) in late 2004, you’ll find a startling reality. While Buffett is the gold standard of value investing, the "Gold Standard" itself—specifically in the hands of Indian households—has been a formidable rival. Data shows that since the inception of the GLD ETF in November 2004, the total return on Gold has actually surpassed Berkshire Hathaway. I...