Skip to main content

5 Rules of Earning Steady Return from Stocks

I was thinking of how one can use current economic turmoil and depressed valuations to earn steady return from stocks. Following applies only if you are optimistic about overall long-term trend that things would recover. If you are pessimists, this does not apply - I would recommend keeping money under mattress (since you may not even trust any banks:-)

  1. Buy stocks of companies which you believe are going to survive and would not declare BK. This is easier said than done since no one believed that Lehman, Washington Mutual would go BK
  2. Buy stocks on days when these companies get penalized (go down by 50% in one day) due to some short-term market issues. Some examples would be HIG below $5, HUN below $3, GNW below $1, MS below $8, DRYS below $4 and so on. You need to be patient and buy only when such opportunities are presented. I always believe that markets are in-efficient in short-term
  3. Buy in quantities. 2000 if stock is below $2, 1000 if it is below $5, 500 if it is below $10. Basically invest about $5000 in one particular stock.
  4. Check out the volume in the stock. Daily volume needs to be at least 1 Million shares
  5. Once you have bought the stock, sell slightly out-of-money covered calls for immediate month (e.g. sell Jan 09) . For example, if stock price is $3-4, sell covered call with strike price of $5. Typically such contracts would be selling for 25-40 cents which would earn you about $250-400 (assuming you have 1000 shares and selling 10 contracts). Hopefully these contracts would expire worthless and you will keep your premium. If stock does go above $5, you would still benefit. Keep on doing this every month
This way one can keep the stock and earn steady returns (like monthly dividends) from your holdings. Most important rule above all is DO NOT do this on margin !

Good luck and good night !

/Shyam

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2026: The Year of Convergence – Melt-up, Moonshots, or Mid-cycle Correction?

Happy New Year! After another period of self-imposed hibernation from the blog—partly due to the festivals, travel, intertia and partly to watch the dust settle on a chaotic 2025—I decided to use the quiet of this New Year’s morning to finally reboot.  Looking back at my October post,  “Clicks to Tokens,”  the hunch about the AI theme held firm. We spent much of 2025 debating whether we were in 1998 or 2000. As we enter 2026, the answer seems to be "neither and both." We have the roaring optimism of the 1920s fueled by "Silicon Spirits," but with the high-speed volatility of the 2020s. So, as the calendar flips, what is in store for 2026? Markets may experience melt-up (S&P touching 8000),  with some moonshots (like SpaceX and OpenAI) IPOs or even see mid-cycle correction bringing down S&P to 6000. That's a wide range and will be decided by Four R's... Here are my thoughts on the " Four R’s ":  Rates, Robots, Rotations, and Real Assets. 1. ...

Rockets, Relics & Roaring Markets: The $4 Trillion Crossroads of 1927 and 1999

Happy (almost) Summer! After watching Kevin Warsh get sworn in at a White House ceremony two days ago, tracking three S-1 filings that could collectively hoover up more capital than every U.S. IPO since 2022 combined, and watching 26-year-old stock charts finally break to new highs — it felt like the right moment to ask the uncomfortable question out loud. Are we at a party that ends gracefully, or one that ends with the furniture on fire? The market is simultaneously flashing the neon signs of 1999  and  the orchestral excess of 1927. Most commentators reach for the dot-com playbook. I think the original Roaring Twenties is the better map. Here's why... Assembly Lines to AI Clusters Ford's River Rouge complex was the largest industrial facility on earth in the 1920s — raw iron in one end, a Model T out the other. Steel, rubber, and oil became the picks-and-shovels of the age. GE and Westinghouse were electrifying factories and homes. The infrastructure buildout  was ...

Stree-Dhan vs. Oracle of Omaha!

Happy February! After another brief hibernation from the blog—partly to digest the early year volatility and partly to observe the shifting sands of global liquidity—it’s time to look at some fascinating disconnects in the market. Lately, I’ve been thinking about the "Unbeatable Asset Class." No, I’m not talking about the S&P 500 or Nvidia. I’m talking about a collective force that has quietly outperformed the "Oracle of Omaha" for over two decades. 1. The Golden Saree: Indian Women vs. Warren Buffett If you look at the performance of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) since the launch of the GLD ETF (the first gold ETF) in late 2004, you’ll find a startling reality. While Buffett is the gold standard of value investing, the "Gold Standard" itself—specifically in the hands of Indian households—has been a formidable rival. Data shows that since the inception of the GLD ETF in November 2004, the total return on Gold has actually surpassed Berkshire Hathaway. I...