Skip to main content

Call options on long-term holdings

We were discussing on how to get steady income from stocks which one is owning for long-term and do not plan to sell anytime soon. Basically lot of us own stocks through ESPP or boughts stocks which we are not planning to sell due to company's long-term prospects. e.g. I have bought some EBAY when in was in mid thirties and not plan to sell anytime soon - one because it is in mid-20's and other reason is that I believe it will go back to low 40's in 18 month. However just holding the stock is not doing any good to my return.

Basically here is how it works in layman's term:

If you have 100 shares of of a stock say EBAY (which is selling at $ 27.15). If you are willing to sell the stock in one month if it goes to say 30 (about 10 % return in one month). Just sell a covered call option for Sept 30 which would net you about $ 30 before commission (about $ 21 after commission). If stock goes about 30, you may have to sell stock at 30 giving you 10 % return in one month. If stock stays below $ 30 before 3rd Saturday on Sept, you keep the change of $ 21 giving you about 1% return on your investment of $ 2700 (for 100 shares). You keep on doing this every month and collecting about 1 % every month effectively giving you nearly 10% return per year - much better than treasury:-)
To reduce trading charges, one can repeat same strategy every two months. So what's the downside (there is no free lunch!) ? If stock moves up substantially above $ 30 due to any event, you would miss out on upside potential.

In general, I found this strategy reasonable for all long-term holdings and I am planning to try it out on couple of stocks.

Now turning to some events:

Last week we went for camping to Napa State Park - it was fun camping. Kids enjoyed a lot playing in small river stream behind our campsite and also playing water balloons. We visited few new wineries nearby - St Joseph, Rutherford Hill, Peju and so on. It was fun, relaxing weekend.

This is last weekend before my second year of MBA starts - it was good summer break and I am definately all ready for going back to School !

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2026: The Year of Convergence – Melt-up, Moonshots, or Mid-cycle Correction?

Happy New Year! After another period of self-imposed hibernation from the blog—partly due to the festivals, travel, intertia and partly to watch the dust settle on a chaotic 2025—I decided to use the quiet of this New Year’s morning to finally reboot.  Looking back at my October post,  “Clicks to Tokens,”  the hunch about the AI theme held firm. We spent much of 2025 debating whether we were in 1998 or 2000. As we enter 2026, the answer seems to be "neither and both." We have the roaring optimism of the 1920s fueled by "Silicon Spirits," but with the high-speed volatility of the 2020s. So, as the calendar flips, what is in store for 2026? Markets may experience melt-up (S&P touching 8000),  with some moonshots (like SpaceX and OpenAI) IPOs or even see mid-cycle correction bringing down S&P to 6000. That's a wide range and will be decided by Four R's... Here are my thoughts on the " Four R’s ":  Rates, Robots, Rotations, and Real Assets. 1. ...

Rockets, Relics & Roaring Markets: The $4 Trillion Crossroads of 1927 and 1999

Happy (almost) Summer! After watching Kevin Warsh get sworn in at a White House ceremony two days ago, tracking three S-1 filings that could collectively hoover up more capital than every U.S. IPO since 2022 combined, and watching 26-year-old stock charts finally break to new highs — it felt like the right moment to ask the uncomfortable question out loud. Are we at a party that ends gracefully, or one that ends with the furniture on fire? The market is simultaneously flashing the neon signs of 1999  and  the orchestral excess of 1927. Most commentators reach for the dot-com playbook. I think the original Roaring Twenties is the better map. Here's why... Assembly Lines to AI Clusters Ford's River Rouge complex was the largest industrial facility on earth in the 1920s — raw iron in one end, a Model T out the other. Steel, rubber, and oil became the picks-and-shovels of the age. GE and Westinghouse were electrifying factories and homes. The infrastructure buildout  was ...

Stree-Dhan vs. Oracle of Omaha!

Happy February! After another brief hibernation from the blog—partly to digest the early year volatility and partly to observe the shifting sands of global liquidity—it’s time to look at some fascinating disconnects in the market. Lately, I’ve been thinking about the "Unbeatable Asset Class." No, I’m not talking about the S&P 500 or Nvidia. I’m talking about a collective force that has quietly outperformed the "Oracle of Omaha" for over two decades. 1. The Golden Saree: Indian Women vs. Warren Buffett If you look at the performance of Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) since the launch of the GLD ETF (the first gold ETF) in late 2004, you’ll find a startling reality. While Buffett is the gold standard of value investing, the "Gold Standard" itself—specifically in the hands of Indian households—has been a formidable rival. Data shows that since the inception of the GLD ETF in November 2004, the total return on Gold has actually surpassed Berkshire Hathaway. I...